|
Chinese Text Project Wiki |
Wiki ->
七修類稿 -> Search for "ctext:236945"
Search details: |
---|
Scope: 七修類稿 |
Condition : References 「法帖刊誤」 |
Total 1 |
---|
68 | 張懷瓘《書斷》曰:「建中初,杜操善草書,章帝喜之,令上表亦作草書,故曰章草。」又謂蕭子雲曰:章草者,漢齊相杜操始變稿法。非也。又引王愔以元帝時,史游作《急就章》,解散隸體,粗書之,漢俗簡,隋漸以行是也。據此,則自相疑惑,謂之「書斷」可乎?近世又以法帖首「千文辰宿」等八十四字,以為漢章帝所書,遂為章草;然黃山谷、米元章俱辯為謬,明矣。復曰:「可通於章奏者,即懷瓘意也。」不知何據。且章帝喜杜書,令之草表,庶有可通,豈一概章奏可草哉!黃伯思《法帖刊誤》云:「凡草書分波磔者名章草,猶古隸之生今正書;故章草者,當在草書先;若章帝者,但謂之草。」又曰:「本無章名,因漢杜操善此書,章帝稱之,故後世目焉;今卷首偶章草,便以為章帝書,謬矣。」此雖似明白,猶未纖悉其義,何也?本無章名以下即前二說,不必辯矣。其曰:「分波磔者為章草」,蓋由杜操、皇象、張芝,方草書《急就》後,惟黃之本傳焉,黃多波磔,今以分波磔者即曰章草;使張、杜之本亦傳,未可即以波磔者名之也?觀法帖張書可知矣。其曰猶古隸之生今正書、蓋史游取《倉頡篇》中正字作《急就章》。正字者,古真書也;秦人王次仲以古書方廣,加少波磔,是為八分;而皇象特少變八分而草之耳,故多波磔,故曰解散隸體。觀姜白石《書譜》亦曰:「學草者先取法於皇象、張芝,則結體平正」,然後效石軍之變化奇崛,豈非尚在草書之先耶?其謬加章帝名者,又可謂之章草耶?如此則章草方明,而書之來歷亦庶幾也。 |
Enjoy this site? Please help. | Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3 | Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here. |